https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1991202 --- Comment #8 from Stefan Bluhm <fedoraproject.org@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- > I just installed the fedora-review-plugin-java, and this issue came out. > I think it doesn't allow you to BR javapackages-local and BR maven-local instead (?) Yepp, missed it. will be updated. Thank you. > License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. I think there might be misunderstanding from my side. I understood that this is the licensing of the package and not the content. That is why I picked that one. Should it be the license of the source files? Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in > xpp3-minimal As far as I understand, minimal is a smaller version of xpp3 and can be installed stand alone. So xpp3-minimal should not have a requirement to xpp3. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
