https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1979081 --- Comment #6 from Georg Sauthoff <fedora@xxxxxxxx> --- As I wrote in my initial posting: > I started from a spec file generated by gem2rpm, but modified some fields/sections where necessary. I revisited it again, the rspec build-requires comes from my modified gem2rpm fedora template. So, I take this back: > Sure, but if a requirement is indeed superfluous on fedora, then gem2rpm could filter it, i.e. when using a fedora template. (since there is nothing to filter for gem2rpm) This is also the reason why you see the different summary/description. I still think that my summary/description is an improvement over the default ones. > ~~~ > Summary: Just allows you to upload gists > ~~~ > Which to me seems good enough. I disagree. If you don't already know what 'gists' are and that rubygem-gist uploads to github, then it doesn't tell you much. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
