Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396171 Summary: Review Request: clamav - Anti-virus software (for EPEL) Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ReportedBy: kevin@xxxxxxxxx QAContact: extras-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx CC: fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx,notting@xxxxxxxxxx Spec URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/clamav/clamav.spec SRPM URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/clamav/clamav-0.91.2-2.el5.src.rpm Description: Anti-virus software History: clamav was branched for EPEL long ago. The fedora maintainer (no anyone else) has expressed interest in maintaining this package in EPEL. I am happy to do so, but I wish to use the above spec instead of the version in fedora. Notes: - The above spec is pretty much the spec from the Dag collection. Thanks Dag for letting me base off your spec file! - The fedora clamav packages remove the 'clamav' user on 'postun', which means on upgrades from the old fedora version in epel, the clamav user is missing. Any clever ideas to get around that welcomed. Perhaps this package should just conflict with the old package instead of obsolete it? - I would love to see several co-maintainers. This package has a history of security issues, and with more eyes on it we could make sure and keep up with updates. - There are some rpmlint complaints, but I think they can all be ignored, please point out any that should be addressed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review