https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758472 Jaroslav Škarvada <jskarvad@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(jskarvad@redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #23 from Jaroslav Škarvada <jskarvad@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Petr Menšík from comment #22) > Because this package is presented on equalizergraphics.com domain, I would > vote for equalizer-graphics, equalizergraphics or just equalizer-g package > name. G may stand for Graphics, GPU, GL, whatever. It hints no relation to > audio equalizer is present, which might be primary expectation of such name. > I don't like libEqualizer if upstream never used that name. > equalizergraphics is not very short, but should work for intermediate > specialized library. And they present it under that name already. > The equalizer-graphics evokes (at least for me) it's graphics subpackage for the equalizer package which is not true. > I am not sure it needs to be renamed, because no package of similar name > already exists. Is there any open source product depending on this library? IIRC at the moment 'bino' from the rpmfusion which now builts without it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
