https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1971315 --- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 <zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Ondrej Mosnacek from comment #4) > (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 from comment #3) > > The most restrictive license is GPLv2,so you can put this in the License > > field, but you can also put all of them if you wish with a comment > > specifying the license breakdown. > > Oh, OK, I found [1], which supports using just the "effective" license. > However, the diagram in [2] suggests that neither of GPLv2 and GPLv3 are a > "superset" of each other, so I guess the effective license should be "GPLv2 > and GPLv3" to be technically correct? (I don't know, maybe I'm overthinking > it?) > Yes this seems to be right. However you should specify the license breakdown in a comment. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
