[Bug 1971315] Review Request: chessx - Chess Database and PGN viewer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1971315



--- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 <zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Ondrej Mosnacek from comment #4)
> (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 from comment #3)
> > The most restrictive license is GPLv2,so you can put this in the License
> > field, but you can also put all of them if you wish with a comment
> > specifying the license breakdown.
> 
> Oh, OK, I found [1], which supports using just the "effective" license.
> However, the diagram in [2] suggests that neither of GPLv2 and GPLv3 are a
> "superset" of each other, so I guess the effective license should be "GPLv2
> and GPLv3" to be technically correct? (I don't know, maybe I'm overthinking
> it?)
> 
Yes this seems to be right. However you should specify the license breakdown in
a comment.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux