https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982306 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Ruzicka <jakub.ruzicka@xxxxxx> --- (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #12) > This is because I changed redhat-rpm-config in F35+ to fix it: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/c/ > e0cfcc0fc76a7642faabb25c5e348d6a1314ace2?branch=rawhide > > (I hope we get this in RHEL 9 too, it would suck dealing with this problem > even longer...) > > For older releases, you'll still need the override. I see, leaving it there. > > * added libyang2-tools Provides: libyang-tools = %{version}-%{release} - does this make sense to replace legacy libyang-tools after the subpackage is removed from libyang1? Just an idea... > > I think it does make sense to do that. You'd probably want > Obsoletes+Provides there. OK, I've added Obsoletes: libyang-tools < 2 > This is actually not necessary, since libyang2 and libyang have no file > conflicts. > > You do, however, need them for -devel and -devel-doc packages. Oh right, it's nice at least the libs themselves can be installed alongside each other. I've shuffled the Conflicts as you suggest. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
