https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738290 --- Comment #17 from Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> --- > I wonder how we should proceed, if having a downstream patch to add a .so > name > versioning as suggested in Comment #3 (and deal with any fallout caused by > the > API/ABI to change before they cut a versioned release) or just wait until > they > do that... The problem we have with patching it downstream if we end up with a conflicting versioning, or if we have to patch any app/library that may currently support libcamera to support the versioned libraries. I suppose the real question is what users outside of the libcamera included utilities do we currently have to utilise libcamera? AKA what currently has support for it? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
