[Bug 1880953] Review Request: python-nocaselist - A case-insensitive list for Python

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880953

Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 <zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+



--- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 <zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Andreas Maier from comment #2)
> I'm very sorry for not having followed up on this - I simply missed it and
> Tony Asleson pointed me to it.
> 
> On your review comments:
> 
> * "Please bump to 1.0.3": I have bumped the version to 1.0.4, the currently
> released version.
> 
> * "Files are 404": I'm not sure I understand what to fix here. The files
> will be pulled in during the package build process, as I understand it. Can
> you elaborate?
> 
> * "You don't need to specify the BuildRequires twice": I removed the first
> section of them, following the example at
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/
> #_example_python_spec_file. However, being a beginner in package
> maintenance, I don't fully understand the package structure yet w.r.t.
> Python 2 and Python 3. I understand that the current Fedora release does not
> contain any Python 2 packages anymore. So why is there still a %package
> statement for a python3-* package name when there is already a Name
> definition for the python-* package name? What is the strategy for new
> Python packages in Fedora, should they be named python3-* or python-*?
> 

Yes we don't have Python 2 anymore, but we kept the python-X as main package
and python3 as a subpackage, probably because otherwise we'd have to rename all
our Python packages,

> In addition, I changed:
> 
> * Source to Source0
> 
> * Used "python%{python3_pkgversion}-" instead of "python3-". I found that in
> several upstream packages, e.g.
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-isort/blob/rawhide/f/python-isort.
> spec
> 
> The resulting spec file has been updated on the master branch of the
> upstream repo at:

Great!

The package is approved but you still need to find a sponsor, see
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux