https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982306 --- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Jakub Ruzicka from comment #1) > Please note that the .spec/SRPM is generated from upstream sources using > apkg, the .spec template is included upstream: > > https://github.com/CESNET/libyang/blob/master/distro/pkg/rpm/libyang2.spec > > Furthermore, the .spec has been extensively tested by both libyang2 and apkg > CI systems on many different distros - it's known to build and install on > Fedora, CentOS, Rocky, and SUSE. > > Fedora already contains libyang v1 but it's incompatible with v2 so I > requested a new libyang2 package instead. > It would probably be better to update libyang to v2 and then build a libyang1 compat package that doesn't ship the tools. Also, this libyang2 package spec massively fails to comply with our guidelines. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
