https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1975859 --- Comment #5 from Lumír Balhar <lbalhar@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Ben Beasley from comment #2) > Note to all that a review may be done here, but approval should be delayed > until the stalled review process is completed for the previous ticket > (RHBZ#1914450). See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1914450#c8. I can wait, that's not a problem. But, is it really necessary if the original review request cannot be accepted because it does not package the latest version? Also, is a situation like this (duplicate review request) documented anywhere? (In reply to Ben Beasley from comment #3) > > # some of them needs `build` package we don't have in Fedora yet, > > Note that there is an existing potentially-stalled review request for that, > too: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910392 Thanks, I plan to package it as well. So I'm gonna take a look and try to contact the requestor. (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #4) > I appreciate the upstream reports! Spec file looks sane, license checks out. > Tests pass, provides and requires are sane. Package installs and functions > as described. Thanks! I've also tried to fix some of them but the code itself is far from perfect. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
