https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973682 --- Comment #6 from Ben Beasley <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- > I'm showing current Fedora isn't providing the non-arched version of json-static: Ugh, you’re right. The maintainer of json-static correctly added the non-arched version in https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/json/c/dcb2174e7bf406af13cbe40750909650fde153de and subsequently removed the arched versions in https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/json/c/c1b06b23466eb54347528bfa962941e6bedb78d7?branch=rawhide, which is why I couldn’t build your spec on Rawhide for review. However, these commits aren’t in the builds for Fedora 34 and older, so the unarched dependency doesn’t work there. (Follow-up: it looks like you found the same while I was writing this.) Since the arched -static dependency can lead to unexpected build failures, I’d suggest just doing something like this for now: > BuildRequires: json-devel > # Un-arched -static virtual Provides is in F35+ only > # https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974376 > %if 0%{?fedora} != 33 && 0%{?fedora} != 34 > BuildRequires: json-static > %endif altering the conditional if you’re planning to support EPEL8. (Are you?) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
