Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xview - XView widget libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=214751 ------- Additional Comments From christian.iseli@xxxxxxxx 2007-11-19 16:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > So what needs to happen? I mean, you could use ExclusiveArch: i386 (and maybe > ppc too) but that seems somewhat pointless. > > There are a few other things that would need to be fixed: "Distributable" is > never OK for a License: and you'd need to remove or split off the static libraries. That sort of went under the radar for a while now. But I'll try to find some time and clean up the mess a bit. I wanted to take a second hard look to see if it would be feasible to make this 64-bit clean... but I could start with a bunch of ExcludeArch. The thing is that if I distribute a 32-bit only package first, things will probably break when the code is cleaned for 64-bits. So I'm a bit hesitant... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review