https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1972601 Danilo Godec <danci@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |MODIFIED Resolution|INSUFFICIENT_DATA |--- Keywords| |Reopened --- Comment #2 from Danilo Godec <danci@xxxxxxxxx> --- Hope it's OK to re-open this 'bug' to submit the SPEC file, src.rpm and the binary x86_64.rpm. This is my first package in Fedora 'universe'. I adapted the SPEC file to build just the openldap-servers binary package - the SPEC file is still named openldap.spec and the resulting src.rpm is also named 'openldap' - should these also be changed to 'openldap-servers' ? All the files are available on copr: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/danci1973/openldap-servers/epel-8-x86_64/02257010-openldap/openldap-2.4.46-16.el8.src.rpm https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/danci1973/openldap-servers/epel-8-x86_64/02257010-openldap/openldap-servers-2.4.46-16.el8.x86_64.rpm https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/danci1973/openldap-servers/epel-8-x86_64/02257010-openldap/openldap.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
