Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bmpx - Beep Media Player eXperimental https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=370561 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-11-19 08:03 EST ------- Before checking -3: (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Well, > > > > ! License is actually strict GPLv2. > Yes - did I miss anything here? No.. it is all right. > > I think the proper way is to rebuild bmpx every time firefox > > is upgraded, or to separate firefox extension related files > > from bmpx (and submit a new review request for bmpx-mozextension, > > for example) if you don't want to rebuild whole bmpx. > The updated spec above creates such an extension, I've nailed the Firefox > compatible version to 2.0.0.9 however I think on the long run we'd be better off > to adapt the current Firefox plugin handling in a version independent directory > for extensions, i.e. we have > /usr/lib[64]/mozilla/plugins for plugins and should use > /usr/lib[64]/mozilla/extensions for extensions. > > Do you think I should file a bug report for this issue? If firefox comes to handle such directories it is preferable for everyone, so you can file against firefox if you want. > > * -devel package? > > - Well, why is this -devel package needed? > > bmpx does not contain any libraries in ldconfig default paths, > > and -devel package does not contain any symlinks for libraries. > > > > As far as I see this package, -devel package is completely unneeded. > My opinion differs here. While the -devel subpackge contains no libraries so > far, all files contained within, i.e. header files and the pkgfile are only > useful for bmpx plugin developers and totally useless for pure end users. Okay, this is a valid reason. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review