[Bug 1968641] Review Request: rust-hyper-rustls - Rustls+hyper integration for pure rust HTTPS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1968641



--- Comment #2 from Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Thanks for the review!

> I wonder if it wouldn't be more practical to define a %{ring_arches} macros with its
> supported arches in that ring package and use it in all subsequent packages as an ExclusiveArch

I've been wondering that as well ... I can try to add that macro with the next
rust-ring update.

https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/34561
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/34562


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux