[Bug 367121] Review Request: ikarus - An incremental optimizing compiler for R6RS Scheme

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ikarus - An incremental optimizing compiler for R6RS Scheme


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=367121





------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx  2007-11-18 17:37 EST -------
This builds fine and rpmlint is silent.  I still don't see the point in an
i386-only program these days, but that's upstream's decision.

One thing is immediately obvious:
  > ikarus.boot
  /usr/bin/ikarus.boot: /usr/bin/ikarus.boot: cannot execute binary file
This file must not be installed in /usr/bin and it shouldn't be executable in
any case.  I know that's upstream's behavior, but it's entirely unacceptable. 
Possibilities include making /usr/bin/ikarus a shell script that passes -b (but
you'd have to take care to do the right thing if someone manually passes -b) or
to simply patch src/ikarus-main.c to default to /usr/lib/ikarus/ikarus.boot
instead of searching through PATH for it.

Other than that, this package is OK, and I'd approve it if the above.

* source files match upstream:
   b286a0833fd1391634439b5c262db49ca76ed5b71d209ebd8e9db6b49e6e19d4  
   ikarus-0.0.1.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, i386).
* package installs properly
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   ikarus = 0.0.1-1.fc9
  =
   libgmp.so.3
* %check is not present; no test suite upstream.  The package seems to run well 
   enough, although I don't really know enough scheme to do much more than
    (+ 1 1)
   which does give "2" as expected.
* no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
X permissions on ikarus.boot are not correct (and it's in the wrong place 
   anyway).
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no static libraries.
* no libtool .la files.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]