Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: afflib - Library for using aff file format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=389471 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2007-11-18 16:39 EST ------- This builds OK for me, and the licensing as you have it seems OK to me. Specifically, this package is BSD+Advertising. It wants to link against: curl-devel - MIT, OK. expat-devel - MIT, OK. fuse-devel - GPL (license tag needs an update, but not OK, already commented out in the spec) libewf-devel - BSD+Adv, OK. ncurses-devel - MIT, OK. openssl-devel - OpenSSL, OK. readline-devel - GPLv2+, not OK, already commented out in spec. zlib-devel - zlib (although license tag says BSD), OK. So I believe this package is OK license-wise as long as it doesn't build against fuse or readline. Perhaps someone could make it build against libedit instead. Still rather uncool for upstream to even allow it to link against GPL stuff. They could have chosen a license that would have allowed that, but they chose not to because they insist on the annoying advertising clause. Has anyone brought that to their attention? But sleuthkit itself, I've no idea, and you'll have to ask spot or submit a review ticket and have it block FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review