[Bug 1965823] Review Request: rust-opml - OPML parser for Rust

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1965823

Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 <zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx



--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 <zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx> ---
 - Include examples/ in %doc?

  - There is a weird tests/spec_samples/LICENSE file with:

© Copyright 2000 UserLand Software, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
© Copyright 2006-2007 Scripting News, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

UserLand Software, Inc. and Scripting News, Inc. are refererred to in the
following as "the Companies."

This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to others, and
derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it or assist in its
implementation may be prepared, copied, published and distributed, in whole or
in part, without restriction of any kind, provided that the above copyright
notice and these paragraphs are included on all such copies and derivative
works.

This document may not be modified in any way, such as by removing the copyright
notice or references to the Companies or other organizations. Further, while
these copyright restrictions apply to the written OPML specification, no claim
of ownership is made by the Companies to the format it describes. Any party
may, for commercial or non-commercial purposes, implement this format without
royalty or license fee to the Companies. The limited permissions granted herein
are perpetual and will not be revoked by the Companies or their successors or
assigns.

This document and the information contained herein is provided on an "AS IS"
basis and THE COMPANIES DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT
INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR
A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

 I don't know what license it is. Seems common on rfc like
https://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec21.html

I've sent a mail to legal to weight on this.
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/thread/6HN5VJKQU24ZXNUQ6E4LKZRH4AXNGAK7/


 - Latest version packaged
 - Builds in mock
 - No rpmlint errors
 - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux