Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ncl - NCAR Command Language and NCAR Graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=381241 ------- Additional Comments From orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-11-18 12:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Now, on to the stuff in %_libdir: > > First, why is it all in %_libdir/ncarg/ncarg? Why not just one ncarg? We put the .a in %_libdir/ncarg to avoid (possible?) conflicts. Once that has been done, you end up with ncarg/ncarg, and it's much too much of a mess to try to change. > What are the .o files in %_libdir/ncarg/ncarg/robj for? Looks like they are various optional features that can be turned on through flags in ncargfcc, etc. when compiling projs. I've moved the -devel package. > Your -devel package should provide ncl-static = %{version}-%{release}. Correct, done. > But really, for a crufty piece of software like this, this package isn't bad. Thanks :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review