[Bug 1964576] Review Request: openiked - Port of OpenBSD's OpenIKED to Linux

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964576

Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 <zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx
           Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx
           Doc Type|---                         |If docs needed, set a value
              Flags|                            |fedora-review?



--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 <zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx> ---
 - BuildArch:      x86_64 aarch64

BuildArch is not for this, you should use ExclusiveArch:

ExclusiveArch:      x86_64 aarch64

Also you should justify why you can't build on other arches.

 - Splitting one BR per line is preferred:

BuildRequires:  cmake
BuildRequires:  libevent-devel
BuildRequires:  openssl-devel
BuildRequires:  byacc
BuildRequires:  clang
BuildRequires:  systemd-rpm-macros

 - This is not necessary:

Requires:       libevent openssl

 It is automatically detected.

 - You are trying to to build with Clang: by default gcc is the Fedora compiler
of choice. Only if you can't build with GCC you should use Clang. In that case,
use:

%global toolchain clang

so that the Fedora default build flags for Clang are set up.
Here since you haven't specified that, the build is performed with gcc. So you
should BR gcc instead of Clang.

 - This is not required;

%systemd_requires
%{?sysusers_requires_compat}

 - You also need the following scriptlet in %preun:

%preun
%systemd_preun openiked.service


 - %attr(0755,root,root) and %attr(0644,root,root), should not be used, the
default values are enough. Only keep %attr(0600,root,root) and
%attr(0700,root,root) are they are specific.

%files
%license LICENSE
%attr(0600,root,root) %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/iked.conf
%{_sbindir}/iked
%{_sbindir}/ikectl
%{_mandir}/man5/iked.conf.5.gz
%{_mandir}/man8/ikectl.8.gz
%{_mandir}/man8/iked.8.gz
%{_unitdir}/openiked.service
%{_sysusersdir}/openiked.conf
%{_sysconfdir}/iked/ca
%{_sysconfdir}/iked/certs
%{_sysconfdir}/iked/crls
%{_sysconfdir}/iked/pubkeys/ipv4
%{_sysconfdir}/iked/pubkeys/ipv6
%{_sysconfdir}/iked/pubkeys/fqdn
%{_sysconfdir}/iked/pubkeys/ufqdn
%attr(0700,root,root) %{_sysconfdir}/iked/private
%{_libexecdir}/openiked/openiked-keygen
%{_unitdir}/openiked-keygen.service
%{_unitdir}/openiked-keygen.target

 - You could probably simplify that:

%attr(0755,root,root) %{_sysconfdir}/iked/pubkeys/ipv4
%attr(0755,root,root) %{_sysconfdir}/iked/pubkeys/ipv6
%attr(0755,root,root) %{_sysconfdir}/iked/pubkeys/fqdn
%attr(0755,root,root) %{_sysconfdir}/iked/pubkeys/ufqdn

into

%{_sysconfdir}/iked/pubkeys

 - Related to this, you do not own the following directories:

  Note: No known owner of /etc/iked/pubkeys, /usr/libexec/openiked,
     /etc/iked

If you do the change above, you'll just need to add:

%dir %{_sysconfdir}/iked/
%dir %{_libexecdir}/openiked/

Otherwise also add:

%dir %{_sysconfdir}/iked/pubkeys

 - The extension for man pages should be globbed as the compression may change
in the future.

%{_mandir}/man5/iked.conf.5.*
%{_mandir}/man8/ikectl.8.*
%{_mandir}/man8/iked.8.*

 - Do not mix $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot}, choose only one and stick to
it.

 - Shouldn't that be 755:

install -p -D -m744 %{SOURCE4}
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libexecdir}/openiked/openiked-keygen

 - use install -p here too:

install -p -m644 %{SOURCE5} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_unitdir}/openiked-keygen.service
install -p -m644 %{SOURCE6} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_unitdir}/openiked-keygen.target

 - You download the asc as Source1 but never check the signature. The signature
should be verified with OpenBSD signify utility but it is not packaged for
Fedora. You could maybe drop the asc from the source. If not, please note that
the asc must be uploaded to dit-git along with archive (fedpkg import will
detect it, or don't forget to upload it with fedpkg new-sources).

 - You should write a Summary that describe what the package does, not simply
mentioning that it is a OpenBSD port.



Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
=======
- Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
  Note: Using both %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
  See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_macros
- systemd_post is invoked in %post, systemd_preun in %preun, and
  systemd_postun in %postun for Systemd service files.
  Note: Systemd service file(s) in openiked
  See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
  guidelines/Scriptlets/#_scriptlets


===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
     BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "ISC License", "*No copyright* ISC License", "Unknown or
     generated", "BSD 2-clause "Simplified" License", "ISC License BSD
     2-clause "Simplified" License", "BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised"
     License". 42 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
     licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/openiked/review-
     openiked/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
     Note: No known owner of /etc/iked/pubkeys, /usr/libexec/openiked,
     /etc/iked
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s).
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
     is arched.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: openiked-6.9.0-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm
          openiked-debuginfo-6.9.0-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm
          openiked-debugsource-6.9.0-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm
          openiked-6.9.0-1.fc35.src.rpm
openiked.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libevent
openiked.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary C OpenIKED
openiked.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US interoperable -> inter
operable, inter-operable, insuperable
openiked.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/iked.conf 600
openiked.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary C OpenIKED
openiked.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US interoperable -> inter
operable, inter-operable, insuperable
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 4 warnings.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux