https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922638 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 <zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends On| |1962319 (sjpeg) --- Comment #10 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 <zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Antonio T. sagitter from comment #9) > (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 from comment #8) > > (In reply to Antonio T. sagitter from comment #7) > > > Issues: > > > ======= > > > - Package installs properly. > > > Note: Installation errors (see attachment) > > > See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ > > > > > > Problem: conflicting requests > > > - nothing provides libsjpeg.so.0.1()(64bit) needed by > > > jpegxl-utils-0.3.7-1.fc35.x86_64 > > > > > > > I have two solutions possible for this: build the binaries with static > > libraries included in them or unbundle sjpeg and make it a separate package. > > What do you think is the best option? I had already made a sjpeg package for > > testing but I haven't submitted it yet for review. > > > > > > You're already compiling libsjpeg dynamic libraries, you may install them in > a private lib directory of jpegxl-libs. > I don't see this as a good option, because if someone else needs sjpeg, they won,t be able to package it or provide it along their package without conflict. > Separating sjpeg as new package is another solution, sure, but in my opinion > you should be sure that the 'sjpeg' code bundled is in truth constantly > upgraded/modified for jpegxl's needs; latest 'sjpeg' code bundled is from a > commit of 12h March 2019 (why?). I would ask to upstream. > Sjpeg is not linked to jpeg-xl, they're independently developed. I don,t expect breakage, considering the active developement of jpeg-xl, it would be fixed pretty quickly I believe. > Fron sjpeg side, the code has been recently modified but never stable > released. Is it ready for "living" alone? :) I think so. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962319 [Bug 1962319] Review Request: sjpeg - SimpleJPEG: simple jpeg encoderSimpleJPEG: simple jpeg encoder -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure