https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922638 --- Comment #8 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 <zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Antonio T. sagitter from comment #7) > Issues: > ======= > - Package installs properly. > Note: Installation errors (see attachment) > See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ > > Problem: conflicting requests > - nothing provides libsjpeg.so.0.1()(64bit) needed by > jpegxl-utils-0.3.7-1.fc35.x86_64 > I have two solutions possible for this: build the binaries with static libraries included in them or unbundle sjpeg and make it a separate package. What do you think is the best option? I had already made a sjpeg package for testing but I haven't submitted it yet for review. > - Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size > (~1MB) or number of files. > Note: Documentation size is 2662400 bytes in 312 files. > See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- > guidelines/#_documentation > > Consider to install %doc %{_vpath_builddir}/html (2.4 MB) documentation by > a doc subpackage. > Done > - 'shared-mime-info' is required by 'jpegxl-libs' > /usr/share/thumbnailers is a directory not owned yet > Done -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
