Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-acepack - ACE and AVAS methods for choosing regression transformations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=381061 tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2007-11-17 21:16 EST ------- Fails to build for me; adding BR: gcc-gfortran gets it going. Interesting bit with ace-copyright.txt. It seems that too few academics pay any attention to licensing. * source files match upstream: 19b4d2b782c7ee13c9b8805c477d1bfd443556402898aff22b791ab64494f437 acepack_1.3-2.2.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. X BuildRequires missing gcc-gfortran. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64) (after fixing BRs) * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has only the expected complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: acepack.so()(64bit) R-acepack = 1.3-1.fc9 = /bin/sh R libR.so()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgfortran.so.1()(64bit) * %check is present and all tests pass. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (R index generation) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED, though obviously you'll need to fix the gfortran thing before you can build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review