Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ncl - NCAR Command Language and NCAR Graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=381241 tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2007-11-17 13:39 EST ------- The remaining rpmlint complaints are: ncl.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/profile.d/ncarg.csh ncl.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/profile.d/ncarg.sh which are both OK as I understand things. I know this isn't going to be a pretty package, what with needing both imake and fortran to build, but the end result doesn't seem terribly bad. Some of the binaries seem destined to conflict with something (fontc, med, psplit, etc.) but this package has been around for so long that it would be pointless to think of renaming any of them. Now, on to the stuff in %_libdir: First, why is it all in %_libdir/ncarg/ncarg? Why not just one ncarg? What are the .o files in %_libdir/ncarg/ncarg/robj for? Your -devel package should provide ncl-static = %{version}-%{release}. But really, for a crufty piece of software like this, this package isn't bad. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review