https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1916041 --- Comment #5 from Pavel Valena <pvalena@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to František Dvořák from comment #4) Firstly, thanks for review! > Issues: > ======= > - license: it should be probably "Ruby or BSD"? Yes, you're right. Same as Ruby. https://github.com/ruby/xmlrpc/blob/master/LICENSE.txt > - there has been release 0.3.2 in the meantime (it's good the new dependency > on 'webrick' has been recently packaged in Fedora :-)) Sure, I'll bump the version. > > > Notes: > ====== > - the different version in changelog - but that's probably just due to the > workflow with "-1.1" version in COPR? Yes, this is a COPR thing, as you can have only one NVR available (new builds+specfiles+srpms with same NVR are removed). This ensures I can have persistent (latest) build available for the URL. It will be removed for the Fedora spec file. _ _ _ _ I've updated the spec file and moved the result here: https://github.com/fedora-distgit/rubygem-xmlrpc/blob/rawhide/rubygem-xmlrpc.spec I've also re-run the builds+tests: https://git.io/J3VmE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
