Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swfdec - Flash animation rendering library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=385041 pertusus@xxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |pertusus@xxxxxxx Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx 2007-11-17 10:41 EST ------- I still have a different timestamp for the file I get with spectool -g and the one in srpm. Not a blocker, though and the timestamps are very similar. * follow guidelines * free software, license included * rpmlint can be ignored: swfdec.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 117, tab: line 1) swfdec-gtk.i386: W: no-documentation swfdec-gtk-devel.i386: W: no-documentation * match upstream 506b032204b71ffac7d0424eaf9608c4 swfdec-0.5.4.tar.gz * libs correctly packaged * %files section right I guess that you know what you do when you put the icons in the gtk subpackage. I haven't verified precisely the buildrequires but they look fine. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review