https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1913870 --- Comment #11 from Eugene A. Pivnev <ti.eugene@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Ben Beasley from comment #10) Ok, let's go: > 1. Upstream does not support building with an external copy of the > dependency. If it did, you would NOT be permitted to bundle, no matter how > inconvenient the extra packaging might be. This was not discussed because Fedora/EPEL repos have no appropriate packages and I have no plan to package them (see my note №1) > 2. You have publicly contacted upstream about a path to supporting system > libraries; and if upstream refused, recorded it in a comment or in a source > file referenced from a comment adjacent to the virtual Provides. There are no such system libs, see above. > 3. You have added the appropriate virtual Provides to your spec file. > These are just metadata, which allow bundling to be tracked. qvge *not* installs any library but statically compiled with them in-place. Just one binary and nothing else. So I cannot provide anything but qvge itself. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
