[Bug 1906980] Review Request: highway - Efficient and performance-portable SIMD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906980



--- Comment #9 from Ben Beasley <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
So, if I may paraphrase, your argument is that a package can require extensions
to the architectural baseline in order to build, as long as the Koji builders
have these extensions in practice. (It’s established that library packages—but
not applications—can require such extensions at runtime,
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/1044.)

That might be a reasonable claim, actually. I’d rather see a package that
builds everywhere, but I’m willing to go with it.

I commented out the %ctest, but the hwy_test executable gets started anyway
partway through the build and explodes as in my previous comment, so I’m going
to have to skip reviewing this one.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux