Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: writer2latex - OpenOffice.org to LaTeX/XHTML filter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=386661 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2007-11-16 12:52 EST ------- Since you didn't bump your release, I can't tell if I have the updated file or not but it seemed to build this time. When I installed the resulting packages, things didn't go very well: /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.26529: line 1: unopkg: command not found error: %post(openoffice.org-writer2latex-0.5-1.fc9.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status 127 GC Warning: Couldn't read /proc/stat GC Warning: GC_get_nprocs() returned -1 Couldn't read /proc/self/stat GC Warning: Couldn't read /proc/stat GC Warning: GC_get_nprocs() returned -1 Couldn't read /proc/self/stat dirname: missing operand Try `dirname --help' for more information. mkdir: missing operand Try `mkdir --help' for more information. GC Warning: Couldn't read /proc/stat GC Warning: GC_get_nprocs() returned -1 Couldn't read /proc/self/stat /usr/bin/rebuild-gcj-db: line 5: 10242 Aborted /usr/bin/gcj-dbtool -n $dbLocation 64 GC Warning: Couldn't read /proc/stat GC Warning: GC_get_nprocs() returned -1 Couldn't read /proc/self/stat xargs: /usr/bin/gcj-dbtool: terminated by signal 6 GC Warning: Couldn't read /proc/stat GC Warning: GC_get_nprocs() returned -1 Couldn't read /proc/self/stat So, what's supposed to provide unopkg? Is it in the path by default? In addition, there's one rpmlint complaint which I don't fully understand at this time: writer2latex.x86_64: W: class-path-in-manifest /usr/share/java/writer2latex-0.5.jar Concensus on IRC is that this isn't a problem, but I don't know quite enough about java to explain why. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review