[Bug 253588] Review Request: ocaml-cil - CIL - Infrastructure for C Program Analysis and Transformation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ocaml-cil - CIL - Infrastructure for C Program Analysis and Transformation


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253588





------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan@xxxxxxxxx  2007-11-16 12:22 EST -------
You need to excludeArch ppc as well:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=244937

(might want to bug the upstream developers about Linux/ppc support, since the
ppc target is supported for OS X)

Completed build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=244948

Question: does ocaml-cil work without the .ml and .o files? From the packaging
guidelines (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/OCaml):

*.o files are not normally included. There is however one exception -- if file
is needed for link (like gtkInit.cmx and gtkInit.o in lablgtk or std_exit.cmx
and std_exit.o in OCaml itself), then it should be included.

*.ml files are not normally included. The exception is if the file describes a
module signature and there is no corresponding .mli file, then the .ml file
should be included. (Note that Debian is more permissive and they often
distribute *.ml files, allowing the programmer to peek at the implementation of
a module).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]