Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: urbanterror - FPS best be described as a Hollywood tactical shooter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=385771 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx 2007-11-16 03:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > I looked at making an RPM for this, when Quake3 was committed, but couldn't find > any explanations as to the licensing. The data files are pretty big (about 1/2 a > gig), so having the data in the RPM would make sense. > Or not, do we really want to add 1 gig per release, so 3 gigs for F-7 F-8 and devel to the diskspace usage just for this one game? > Hans, did you do any research on the licensing of the data files? Yes, here is what upstreams license info says: "Urban Terror is distributed free over the Internet and is covered by the Quake 3SDK licence agreement [EULA]. The mod files may not be sold [in any form] or distributed on physical media unless with permission from iD Software. For further information on legal use of programs derived from Quake 3 source code, please contact their respective authors." This seems to stem from before quake3 itself was released under the GPL, we could ask them to change this and maybe the are willing to allow unmodified redistribution. But do we really want to carry those 3 Gigs? Notice that the current package uses autodownloader, and thus works around the current license. The current package is really nothing more then a bunch of textfiles, I wanted to first add these to the quake3 rpm, but then Urban Terror won't show up int "Add / Remove Programs" from the Applications menu. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review