[Bug 1908922] Review Request: libopenaptx - Open Source implementation of Audio Processing Technology codec (aptX)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908922

Linus Lewandowski <linus@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |linus@xxxxxxxxx



--- Comment #17 from Linus Lewandowski <linus@xxxxxxxxx> ---
aptX was created by Audio Processing Technology Ltd (a subsidiary of Solid
State Logic Ltd) in 1990s - see https://www.aptx.com/history and
https://patents.google.com/patent/EP0398973B1/en (the expired patent mentioned
earlier)

APT Ltd was sold - (one can safely assume: together with all the patents
required for aptX) - in 2005:
https://www.mixonline.com/technology/solid-state-logic-sells-apt-381257

There is only one patent assigned to APT Ltd:
https://patents.google.com/?assignee=Audio+Processing+Technology+Limited - it's
the expired one (EP0398973B1).

The original owner - Solid State Logic Ltd - had some more patents:
https://patents.google.com/?assignee=Solid+State+Logic - but they're all
expired, except for one from 2020.

So... I'm pretty sure that there is no other patent that affects aptX itself.

There might still be something affecting aptX LL (launched in 2012) and aptX HD
(launched in 2016) - but they aren't really innovative.

aptX LL is the trivial merge of the idea behind CSR FastStream (launched in
2008, https://web.archive.org/web/20080509054609/www.csr.com/pr/pr328.htm) and
the aptX codec. FastStream looks like patent-free, because it's referred to in
https://patents.google.com/patent/US9398620B1/en (expired), and this patent
does not depend on any other related patent - while it describes how to use
FastStream in a selected use case.

aptX HD seems to just be a different set of settings for the aptX algorithm,
but I'm not really sure here, I haven't looked at the code.

On the other hand, aptX Adaptive (launched in 2018) might be innovative - it
introduces variable bit rate - so I wouldn't recommend adding it at this point.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux