Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdiscid - A library for creating MusicBrainz DiscIDs Alias: libdiscid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384191 ------- Additional Comments From alexl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-11-16 01:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Well... from README > NOTE: This library is also bundled with libmusicbrainz version 3 or later. > If you already have libmusicbrainz installed, there is no need to > install libdiscid separately. > > This means the package will be obsoleted soon... So I would say if > libmusicbrainz2 could have libdiscid support, that would be fine to add it from > within the libmusicbrainz2 package and not as a separate package... > > If any have futher advices....? We should probably consult the libmusicbrainz maintainer, Bastien and/or the python-musicbrainz2 maintainer about whether to upgrade libmusicbrainz to version 3. It's my understanding also that python-musicbrainz2 should use libdiscid, but whether it's sufficient to have that in libmusicbrainz, or a standalone library, I'm not sure. I'll check on the #musicbrainz IRC channel on freenode. Meanwhile since picard doesn't directly detect or require libdiscid (either at build-time or run-time), and runs perfectly fine without it, please don't let this package review stop the picard review from proceeding... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review