Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tla - A version control system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=376421 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray@xxxxxxxxx 2007-11-16 01:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > The license tag is wrong. The source doesn't include any statement of GPL > version, but docs-tla/index.tst says version 2 or later, so you should have > License: GPLv2+. It is not so simple. There is a twist in every Arch tale. Have a look: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2007-11/msg00002.html So as per upstream's advice I am keeping License as GPLv2 until they migrate to GPLv3+ or something else. > I note you remove all of the original changelog. It's fine to remove old > stuff but I'd be uneasy about removing all of it. The problem is that there are too many changelog files. I was at a loss to figure out which one(s) to include in the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review