[Bug 376421] Review Request: tla - A version control system

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: tla - A version control system


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=376421





------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray@xxxxxxxxx  2007-11-16 01:22 EST -------
(In reply to comment #2) 

> The license tag is wrong.  The source doesn't include any statement of GPL
> version, but docs-tla/index.tst says version 2 or later, so you should have
> License: GPLv2+.

It is not so simple. There is a twist in every Arch tale. Have a look:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2007-11/msg00002.html

So as per upstream's advice I am keeping License as GPLv2 until they migrate to
GPLv3+ or something else.

> I note you remove all of the original changelog. It's fine to remove old
> stuff but I'd be uneasy about removing all of it.

The problem is that there are too many changelog files. I was at a loss to
figure out which one(s) to include in the package.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]