https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1945159 --- Comment #3 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> --- License: LGPLv3+ and GPLv2+ and BSD and MIT and ASL 2.0 and MPLv2.0 and zlib # Rizin as a package is targeting to be licensed/compiled as LGPLv3+ # however during build for Fedora the GPL code is not omitted so effectively it # is GPLv2+. Please be aware that the License field describes the binary package, not the sources [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:FAQ#Does_the_License:_tag_cover_the_SRPM_or_the_binary_RPM.3F]. And if sources with "permissive" licenses are mixed with GPL in a single binary, then the effective license is most likely GPLv2. So maybe this license list can be simplified? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
