https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1925323 --- Comment #4 from Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to ericedens from comment #3) > If possible, it'd be nice to stay consistent with upstream. I did some > research, and these two reference (seem to) support using `/etc`: > > - "The /etc/ directory is reserved for configuration files that are local > to the machine" on > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/14/html/ > Storage_Administration_Guide/s1-filesystem-fhs.html > - "Don’t use %config or %config(noreplace) under /usr. /usr is deemed to > not contain configuration files in Fedora" on > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ The first guide predates the changes to how configuration works, and the second guide is still correct. You would not mark this as a config file in /usr. If you're going to make user configuration get effectively blown away on upgrade, it's better to actually install it as a static regular file in /usr rather than what you're doing in /etc. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
