Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: debootstrap - Bootstrap a basic Debian GNU/Linux system Alias: debootstrap-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=329291 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-11-15 16:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Isn't it a typo in > debootstrap-1.0.3-devices.patch > should be dev instead of dir? That's quite strange that it > worked... Maybe the devices may be created on the fly anyway? Right, I fixed the dir to dev. > Also there is a path in the debootstrap script, > DEBOOTSTRAP_DIR=/usr/lib/debootstrap > In my spec I did: > sed -i.datadir -e > 's:DEBOOTSTRAP_DIR=/usr/lib/debootstrap:DEBOOTSTRAP_DIR=%{_datadir}/%{name}/:' > debootstrap Right, I have forgotten an existing /usr/lib/debootstrap in place from some previous attempt. This might have been the reason why did the install work even with 'dir' instead of 'dev' > rpmlint says: > debootstrap.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 13) > debootstrap.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man8/debootstrap.8.gz Attempted to fix both. rpmlint is quiet now. And soo, here are the updated packages: SPEC: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SPECS/debootstrap.spec SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/mock-results/debootstrap-1.0.3-2.fc9.noarch/debootstrap-1.0.3-2.fc9.noarch.rpm mock: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/mock-results/debootstrap-1.0.3-2.fc9.noarch/ Thanks for the reminder, Parag, and thanks for the patience Patrice. I'm horribly sorry for the delay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review