https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1939875 Otto Urpelainen <oturpe@xxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(manisandro@gmail. | |com) --- Comment #9 from Otto Urpelainen <oturpe@xxxxxx> --- Great progress! The only remaining thing is source rpm licensing. I think it would be the best if upstream could be convinced to do the following: 1. Add copy of the Gumbo license in the repository. README.md already mentions Gumbo's licensing and all source files start by declaring the Apache Software License 2.0. But, the license conditions require attaching a copy of the license, not just linking to it. 2. Clarify the situation of xxd.exe licensing (most probably it is the Vim license, but it is the best let upstream say what it is, because they should know where they got it from) and add its license text. If that is not possible, then the source rpm must be modified. See the mailing list discussion linked above for option. (Hopefully upstream agrees to clarify its licensing and we do not have to do this.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
