[Bug 1937810] Review Request: sysmontask - Linux system monitor with the compactness and usefulness of WTM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1937810



--- Comment #15 from Alessio <alciregi@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Artem from comment #12)
> > Still talking about gi_composites.py file, the License: field in the spec file should contain "BSD and GPLv2+" based on what is stated on this [1] document?
> 
> Absolutely right. Thanks. gi_composites.py under LGPLv2+ license. I've added
> annotation in .spec file:

Good.

> https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/sysmontask.spec
> https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/sysmontask-1.1.1-0.4.beta.b.fc33.
> noarch.rpm

You didn't include the new srpm (just to facilitate the use of fedora-review
command).


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux