https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936772 Aleksei Bavshin <alebastr89@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends On| |182235 (FE-Legal) --- Comment #2 from Aleksei Bavshin <alebastr89@xxxxxxxxx> --- Adding FE-Legal blocker. https://github.com/saitoha/libsixel/blob/master/LICENSE.sixel looks benign and the source files in question mention that the code was relicensed under MIT[1][2]. I can't read the original license text though and not qualified to make decisions on the custom licenses, however permissive these are. Several sources are also originally distributed under public domain. In my (limited) understanding that means it's fine to distribute the result under MIT and keep the License tag as simple `MIT`. Ben, can you please look into that and confirm that it's safe to consider the combined work licensed as MIT? I hope we have someone who can read Japanese flavor of legalese :) [1] https://github.com/saitoha/libsixel/blob/master/src/fromsixel.c [2] https://github.com/saitoha/libsixel/blob/master/src/tosixel.c Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182235 [Bug 182235] Fedora Legal Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
