https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1935650 --- Comment #6 from Jarek Prokop <jprokop@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Pavel Valena from comment #4) > (In reply to Jarek Prokop from comment #2) > > (In reply to Pavel Valena from comment #1) > </snip> > > > we need to specify so arch-specific dependencies with richdeps (if > > > libffi...). On the upside, there's no need for the patch. > > > > There is because the library is using hardcoded to search for `libzmq.so`[0] > > which is only in the `zeromq-devel` and that package pulls in many > > unnecessary devel dependencies (and libzmq.so is not present not even via > > symlink in the bare `zeromq` package). > > Ah, sorry, I didn't check the patch and thought it's doing something > different. Yes, we don't want zeromq-devel. Isn't that a bug, though? > > Denis, could you comment, please? Hmm, looks like at least according to ruby-ffi[1] wiki it does not seem like a bug on our end. > > > > > [0] the line gets expanded into `libzmq.so` specifically, so if we require > > `libzmq.so.5` in spec it would pull in zeromq, but it would not work. > > Jarku, if it's a correct soname, can you create a PR upstream? I think it should look not only for `libzmq.so` (which seems like the preferred upstream approach) but also for `libzmq.so.5`. I'll open a PR upstream and add a comment with a PR link to the spec once I do so. > > > > > > > [0] > > https://github.com/chuckremes/ffi-rzmq-core/blob/master/lib/ffi-rzmq-core/ > > libzmq.rb#L39 [1] https://github.com/ffi/ffi/wiki/Loading-Libraries#linux-packages -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
