https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934194 --- Comment #7 from code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx --- > Note that even with the intersphinx fix you suggested I still get: … Hmm, you’re right. It looks like intersphinx does not like file:// URIs, but it does accept plain old paths (https://www.sphinx-doc.org/en/master/usage/extensions/intersphinx.html#confval-intersphinx_mapping). That should have been: # Use local intersphinx inventory sed -r -i 's|https://docs.python.org/3|file:/%{_docdir}/python3-docs/html|' \ docs/source/conf.py I had to fix this on my own package too: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934257 ---- %if 0%{?fedora} < 33 || 0%{?rhel} < 9 is not correct; either %fedora or %rhel is undefined, so either 0%{?fedora} is 0, which is less than 33, or 0%{?rhel} is 0, which is less than 9. So it always evaluates true. If this came from pyp2rpm, then it is a bug in pyp2rpm. If you are not building for EPEL, you can just check if 0%{?fedora} == 32. ---- I’m getting - Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate. Note: Unversionned Python dependency found. See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- guidelines/Python/#_dependencies which I though was a false positive, triggered by the documentation package %package -n python-%{pypi_name}-doc It would be much more conventional to write that as %package doc which, with python-%{pypi_name} as the base name, would still give you the same subpackage name. I tested it with that change and still had the complaint, though. I’m getting Requires -------- python3-libcst (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): python(abi) python3.9dist(pyyaml) python3.9dist(typing-extensions) python3.9dist(typing-inspect) Provides -------- python3-libcst: python-libcst python3-libcst python3.9-libcst python3.9dist(libcst) python3dist(libcst) so something is going on that has nothing to do with the documentation. I’ll post a full review after I figure out what the problem is. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
