https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1462467 --- Comment #16 from Raphael Groner <projects.rg@xxxxxxxx> --- Thanks for your interest. (In reply to Robert Scheck from comment #15) > Is the package usable at all, if no 3rd-party repository is enabled? "We may want to use weak dependencies here instead, I can remove mplayer." > So are then e.g. just minor features missing? Yes. Weak dependency (for mplayer) may not work for cross-repos. > Aside of that, the latest version is 1.21 which might address the license workaround in the spec file? ASL 2.0, see https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~kirkland/hollywood/trunk/view/head:/debian/copyright#L8 Though I fail to remember why added CC0 as well. Propably suggest from licensecheck script. Indeed, packaging version 1.12 seems to be very conservative. Going to take a closer look into more current version with obviously more 3rd-party support, besides fixes. https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~kirkland/hollywood/trunk/view/head:/debian/changelog -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
