[Bug 222338] Review Request: initng-conf-gtk - InitNG configuration and control utility

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: initng-conf-gtk - InitNG configuration and control utility


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222338


bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |medium
           Priority|normal                      |medium
            Product|Fedora Extras               |Fedora

akahl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |akahl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx




------- Additional Comments From akahl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2007-11-13 21:39 EST -------
This is not a formal review as I am not a sponsor:

* rpmlint:
 - W: invalid-license GPL
GPL is not a valid license, please use GPLv2[+] or GPLv3[+] instead. According
to the COPYING file and the source file's headers, the license is GPLv2+.

 - W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/initng-conf-gtk.schemas
This can be ignored as gconf schema files always have to be overwritten on
package updates.

* The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
* The spec file name matches the base package
* Fedora approved license (GPLv2+)
E License field in the package spec file DOES NOT match the actual license
* Latest version is being packaged
* Dist tag is present
* Build root is correct
* The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source
0dba2797764b33e1f58931a4ed11d465adc4d2ce  initng-conf-gtk-0.5.tar.gz
* The spec file is written in American English
* The spec file is legible
* Builds in mock (dist-f8)
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=240809
* All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires
* %install starts with build root clean
* %clean starts with build root clean
* Package own all directories that it creates
E Package owns files or directories already owned by other packages
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/22x22
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/22x22/apps
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/24x24
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/24x24/apps
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/36x36
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/36x36/apps
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps

I suggest replacing line 92 with
%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/*/apps/initng.png
to solve this.

* GConf part looks OK
E Scriptlets are NOT sane:
- desktop-database part is not OK
Please update the affected parts according to 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets
The desktop file is installed properly.

- Scrollkeeper part is not OK

Update according to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets
as above

* No library
* Locale part handled properly
* Consolehelper part looks OK
* debuginfo package looks complete
* No duplicates in %files
* File permissions are appropriate
* The package contains code
* All filenames are valid UTF-8
* No pkgconfig files


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]