[Bug 1933940] Review Request: xclock - xclock is the classic X Window System clock utility

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933940

Parag AN(पराग) <panemade@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |panemade@xxxxxxxxx
           Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |panemade@xxxxxxxxx
              Flags|                            |fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Not doing full package review here.

Suggestions:
1) Fix rpmlint warning before import of this package in Fedora.

Rpmlint
-------
Checking: xclock-1.0.9-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm
          xclock-debuginfo-1.0.9-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm
          xclock-debugsource-1.0.9-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm
          xclock-1.0.9-1.fc35.src.rpm
xclock.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized C xclock is the classic X Window
System clock utility
xclock.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary C xclock
xclock.src: W: summary-not-capitalized C xclock is the classic X Window System
clock utility
xclock.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary C xclock
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.




Rpmlint (debuginfo)
-------------------
Checking: xclock-debuginfo-1.0.9-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.





Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
xclock.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized C xclock is the classic X Window
System clock utility
xclock.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary C xclock
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.



Source checksums
----------------
https://www.x.org/pub/individual/app/xclock-1.0.9.tar.bz2 :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     :
cf461fb2c6f2ac42c54d8429ee2010fdb9a1442a370adfbfe8a7bfaf33c123bb
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
cf461fb2c6f2ac42c54d8429ee2010fdb9a1442a370adfbfe8a7bfaf33c123bb


Requires
--------
xclock (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    libX11.so.6()(64bit)
    libXaw.so.7()(64bit)
    libXft.so.2()(64bit)
    libXmu.so.6()(64bit)
    libXrender.so.1()(64bit)
    libXt.so.6()(64bit)
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libm.so.6()(64bit)
    libxkbfile.so.1()(64bit)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)

xclock-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):

xclock-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):



Provides
--------
xclock:
    xclock
    xclock(x86-64)

xclock-debuginfo:
    debuginfo(build-id)
    xclock-debuginfo
    xclock-debuginfo(x86-64)

xclock-debugsource:
    xclock-debugsource
    xclock-debugsource(x86-64)



This package looks good to me.

APPROVED.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux