[Bug 1926697] Review Request: openjdk-asmtools - An OpenSource project to develop tools for the production of proper and improper Java '.class' files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1926697



--- Comment #32 from Jaya <jhuttana@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #30)
> %global major 7.0
> %global minor b10
> Name:           openjdk-asmtools
> Version:        %{major}.%{minor}
> Release:        pre.0.1%{?dist}
> 
> - "pre" does not belong anywhere
> - which upstream commit is used? it is not defined
> 
> Something like this should be used if you want to use "pre-release" snapshot
> versioning:
> 
> %global major 7.0
> %global minor b10
> 
> %global commit 40-CHARACTER-HASH-VALUE
> %global shortcommit %(c=%{commit}; echo ${c:0:7})
> %global commitdate YYYYMMDD
> 
> Name:           openjdk-asmtools
> Version:        %{major}.%{minor}
> Release:        0.1.%{commitdate}.git%{shortcommit}%{?dist}
> [...]
> Source0:       
> https://github.com/openjdk/asmtools/archive/%{commit}/%{name}-%{shortcommit}.
> tar.gz
> [...]
> %autosetup -n asmtools-%{commit}
> 
> Or, if you want to use "post-snapshot" versioning instead, it should be:
> 
> %global major 7.0
> %global minor b09
> 
> %global commit 40-CHARACTER-HASH-VALUE
> %global shortcommit %(c=%{commit}; echo ${c:0:7})
> %global commitdate YYYYMMDD
> 
> Name:           openjdk-asmtools
> Version:        %{major}.%{minor}
> Release:        1.%{commitdate}.git%{shortcommit}%{?dist}
> [...]
> Source0:       
> https://github.com/openjdk/asmtools/archive/%{commit}/%{name}-%{shortcommit}.
> tar.gz
> [...]
> %autosetup -n asmtools-%{commit}
> 
> 
> The only differences are:
> 
> - leading "0." in Release for pre-release snapshot, such that proper version
> sorts higher
> - no leading "0." for post-release snapshot, such that it will sort higher
> than last proper version
> 
> But specifying the commit and date is mandatory in either case.
> 
> (I agree, the <snapinfo> stuff from the Guidelines is very hard to
> understand.)
> 
> And do not download sources manually. If necessary, use "spectool -g", it
> will evaluate macros from the spec use the correct output name.

Thank you Fabino!! Your suggestions were very handy for me :) I have included
the suggested changes to spec file and uploaded.
@decathor and @jvane : Could you please take a look?

Spec file URL: https://jhuttana.fedorapeople.org/openjdk-asmtools.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jhuttana.fedorapeople.org/openjdk-asmtools-7.0.b10-0.1.20210122.git7eadbbf.fc35.src.rpm
Man Page URL: https://jhuttana.fedorapeople.org/openjdk-asmtools.1
Launcher URL: https://jhuttana.fedorapeople.org/openjdk-asmtools


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux