https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1924918 --- Comment #10 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> --- > > Is glibc-all-langpacks really necessary? That's a lot of data. > > What's needed in reprotest is several locales which are randomly changed for > reproducible tests and I've not found any other alternative to this big > package? Any other clue? You could do something like Requires: glibc-langpack-fr Requires: glibc-langpack-es Requires: glibc-langpack-ru Requires: glibc-langpack-kk Requires: glibc-langpack-zh Requires: glibc-langpack-en If the list of locales used by reprotest doesn't change often, that'd be OK. But if you'd have to adapt it periodically, than I don't think it makes sense. glibc-all-langpacks is 230MB, it's not end of the world. > Yes we plan to also use separate branch on upstream to maintain this spec. > Notably, for possible OpenSUSE community to use it. That'll only work as long if the two packaging standards are exactly in alignment. I think it'll be more work than it's worth with proxying the changes three ways. But that's just an opinion… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
