https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922869 --- Comment #10 from Carl George 🤠 <carl@xxxxxxxxxx> --- > This is a common thing done in Fedora when you want to guarantee they're updated together, especially as I don't know what the interface boundaries are for tukit with libtukit, so I prefer to keep the explicit dependency. The guidelines say not to do this with libraries [0], but that seems more targeted at libraries that are not part of the same spec file. It's understandable to want these subpackages to always be updated together, so I won't block on this. > No idea how to deal with this. I found some notes on how to fix it [1]. It's just a warning so we don't need to block on it, but try to fix later if you can. [0] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_explicit_requires [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#unused-direct-shlib-dependency -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
