https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1834731 --- Comment #58 from Warren Togami <wtogami@xxxxxxxxx> --- > Yes, I know. But this doesn't automatically mean that Bitcoin Core developers are right. Ethereum developers have radically different opinion, for example. Ethereum has had numerous emergency updates due to catastrophic errors through the years. Bitcoin has had significantly fewer emergency updates. You call this a difference of opinion. We call this wisdom. Let's not go deeper into the ideological debate. Regarding the bundled library argument I was unfair that I did not respond. I am well aware of the bundled library reasoning. I am among the people who wrote Fedora's packaging standards and zealously defended it years ago. There is more recently an exceptions process where bundled libraries are allowed in Fedora. Bitcoin Core through the years has been working towards progressively eliminating external library dependencies because they have been the source of most dangerous vulnerabilities. That being said the libraries that it continues to rely upon are carefully tracked by the upstream project. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bundled_Libraries?rd=Packaging:Bundled_Libraries Fedora now has a process to help keep track of bundled libraries. This package will follow these guidelines and anything else required by FESCO. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
