Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: httrack - Website copier and offline browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=366121 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray@xxxxxxxxx 2007-11-12 12:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > * About dangling-relative-symlink: Fixed. I have contacted upstream for confirmation. Looking at the Makefiles, I gather that the libraries under /usr/lib/httrack were created from the libtest/ files, which are appear to mere examples. > * openssl header used? > > [...] > > All in comments!! Silly me! However we do need a 'Requires: openssl' for the main package because src/htsmodules.c tries to dlopen libssl.so*. > By the way.. > * undefined-non-weak-symbol Not yet fixed. I am looking into this. > * generic header file name and generic macro name in > header file. Not yet fixed. Many of the macros are used to differentiate between #ifdef _WIN32 and so on. Clearly we would not have _WIN32 defined in Fedora -- Fedora is GNU/Linux and not Windows. So can I just remove all those _WIN32 (and similar) specific portions from htsglobal.h ? > * Dependency for firefox or so Fixed. > * File entry > - By the way, the file entries > > [...] > > can be replaced by I have used this style in all my specs, since I like to differentiate between directories and files. Maybe this sounds silly, but I hope you will allow it. :-) Spec: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/httrack.spec SRPM: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/httrack-3.41.3-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review